These documents are protected by various copyright laws, and they may be used for personal, research use only. Your click on any of the links below constitutes your request for a personal copy of the linked article, and our delivery of a personal copy. Any other use is prohibited!
If you are unable to find the PDF for a paper, feel free to email pansky@research.haifa.ac.il
Algom, D., Dekel, A., & Pansky, A. (1996). The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited. Memory & Cognition, 24(5), 557-572. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (1999). Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 39-58. [PDF]
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481-537. [PDF]
Lavidor, M., Ellis, A. W., & Pansky, A. (2002). Case alternation effects in lateralized word recognition: Studies in Hebrew and English. Brain and Cognition, 50(2), 257-271. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 259-274. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Koriat, A. (2004). The basic-level convergence effect in memory distortions. Psychological Science, 15(1), 52-59. [PDF]
Goldsmith M., Koriat A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 505-525. [PDF]
Pansky, A., Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (2005). Eyewitness recall and testimony. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 93-150). New York: Guilford Press. [PDF]
Pansky, A., Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2009). Memory accuracy in old age: Cognitive, metacognitive, and neurocognitive determinants. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(2/3), 303-329. [PDF]
Mulder, R.V. De, Noortwijk, C. van, Goldsmith M., Pansky, A., Koriat, A., Kadouri- Labin S. (2010), CORMAS: A Computerized Tool for the Analysis of Eyewitness Memory Correspondence. European Journal of Law and Technology, 1(3), 1-18. [PDF]
Goldsmith, M., Pansky, A., Koriat, A., Mulder, R.V. De, Noortwijk, C. van, Memon, A., & Markowitsch, H. (2011). The assessment of eyewitness memory: A multi-componential correspondence-oriented approach. In P. Kleve & K. van Noortwijk (Eds.), Something bigger than yourself: Essays in honor of Richard De Mulder (pp. 57-75). Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
Koriat, A., Pansky, A., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). An output-bound perspective on false memories: the case of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting (pp. 302-332). New York: Psychology Press. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Tenenboim, E. (2011a). Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 155-170. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Tenenboim, E. (2011b). Interactions between spontaneous instantiations to the basic level and post-event suggestions. Memory, 19(8), 901-915. [PDF]
Pansky, A., Tenenboim, E., & Bar, S. K. (2011). The misinformation effect revisited: Interactions between spontaneous memory processes and misleading suggestions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 270-287. [PDF]
Pansky, A. (2012). Inoculation against forgetting: Advantages of immediate vs. delayed initial testing due to superior verbatim accessibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1792-1800. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Nemets. E. (2012). Enhancing the quantity and accuracy of eyewitness memory via initial memory testing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(1), 2-11. [PDF]
Goldsmith, M., Pansky, A., & Koriat, A. (2014). Metacognitive control of memory reporting. In T. J. Perfect & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Applied Memory(pp. 481-500). London, UK: Sage. [PDF]
Pansky, A., & Goldsmith, M. (2014). Metacognitive effects of initial question difficulty on subsequent memory performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1255-1262. [PDF]
Portnoy, S., & Pansky, A. (2016). Metacognitive effects of initial question difficulty on subsequent eyewitness memory performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(2), 159-167. [PDF]
Sheaffer, R., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2018). Why were those details so hard for me to recall? Experienced ease of selective retrieval modulates episodic gist memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 379-386. [PDF]
Pansky, A., Oren, Y., Yaniv, H., Landa, O., Gotlieb, A., & Hemed, E. (2019). Positive and negative effects of gender expertise on episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 47(2), 257-265.[PDF]
Adler, O. & Pansky, A. (2019, in press). A “rosy view” of the past: Positive memory biases. To appear in T. Aue and H. Okon-Singer (Eds.), Cognitive Biases in Health and Psychiatric Disorders. Elsevier. [PDF]
Shapira, A. A. & Pansky, A. (2019, in press). Cognitive and metacognitive determinants of eyewitness memory accuracy over time. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Metacognition and Learning. [PDF]. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09206-7.
Entries in Encyclopedias
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2003). Memory distortions and forgetting. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (pp. 1076-1081). Nature Publishing Group (Macmillan). [PDF]
Copyright Notice
The documents distributed here have been provided as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work on a noncommercial basis. Single copies of these articles can be downloaded and printed only for the reader's personal research and study. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.